115 South Victory Street, Little Rock, Arkansas 72201

Office@TheOvertonFirm.com

Office@TheOvertonFirm.com

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Construction Law
  • Construction Mediation
  • Cost
  • J. Don Overton
  • Faq
    • Arbitration Awards
    • Arkansas Lien Law
    • Business Collections
    • Deposition FAQ
    • Eminent Domain FAQ
    • Mediation FAQ
  • Build 2 Rent & Apartments
  • Off Site Construction
    • Top 10 Reasons 4 Off Site
    • 2020 - Modular Growth
    • McKinsey Report FAQs
  • More
    • Home
    • Practice Areas
    • Construction Law
    • Construction Mediation
    • Cost
    • J. Don Overton
    • Faq
      • Arbitration Awards
      • Arkansas Lien Law
      • Business Collections
      • Deposition FAQ
      • Eminent Domain FAQ
      • Mediation FAQ
    • Build 2 Rent & Apartments
    • Off Site Construction
      • Top 10 Reasons 4 Off Site
      • 2020 - Modular Growth
      • McKinsey Report FAQs
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Construction Law
  • Construction Mediation
  • Cost
  • J. Don Overton
  • Faq
    • Arbitration Awards
    • Arkansas Lien Law
    • Business Collections
    • Deposition FAQ
    • Eminent Domain FAQ
    • Mediation FAQ
  • Build 2 Rent & Apartments
  • Off Site Construction
    • Top 10 Reasons 4 Off Site
    • 2020 - Modular Growth
    • McKinsey Report FAQs

The Overton Firm, LLC

The Overton Firm, LLCThe Overton Firm, LLCThe Overton Firm, LLC

COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL & MODULAR CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT

COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL & MODULAR CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL & MODULAR CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL & MODULAR CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL & MODULAR CONSTRUCTION & REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT

Arkansas Construction Mediation

Virtually every construction project starts with a spirit of cooperation between the owner, the contractor and the design team with a mutual shared promise to work together to bring the project to successful completion.  Promises and agreements at a project kick-off meeting to resolve disputes amicably may be made with the best intentions but rarely occur.


Disputes arise on virtually every construction project and mediation is commonly employed to help resolve them. However, some mediation techniques can actually drive the parties farther apart and be counter-productive. As a result, it is important to consider various dispute resolution options and the pros and cons of various mediation techniques, including the use of technical experts, in order to decide which techniques are most likely to provide for effective dispute resolution.  Since the views or opinions of a mediator are not binding on any party, mediation is only successful if the mediator can convince the parties that resolving the dispute is in each of their best interests.  It is often said that in a successful mediation, neither party is completely satisfied with the outcome but each can accept the result.  While each mediator has a unique style, most mediators generally employ one of two styles: facilitative or evaluative.


Under the facilitative approach, a mediator does not provide opinions or evaluation of a position. Instead, during joint sessions with the parties, the mediator asks questions designed to flush out the parties’ respective positions with the goal that this process will help the parties reach a consensus on the issues.


Under the evaluative approach, joint sessions with the parties are limited and the mediator conducts multiple separate sessions with each party during which he states his views on the strengths and weaknesses of a position, including in many cases his views on the likely result if the case were tried by a judge or jury.  The views and opinions of a mediator have no binding effect but are simply tools to resolve the dispute. However, since a mediator using this approach opines on specific legal issues and the merits of each party’s claims, he or she should have legal expertise as well as significant knowledge. Further, since the goal of mediation is settlement, it is important to remember that in expressing his views the mediator has an incentive to convince each party that its position has significant weaknesses.

Good mediators will alter their approach given the flow of a particular mediation. A mediator that generally utilizes a facilitative approach might feel at some point that expressing his opinion about a particular issue might aid settlement. However, in choosing a mediator it is wise to consider his general approach and how that might play out in light of the issues and parties. It is also important to keep in mind that the mediator’s goal is to resolve the dispute. Even when a mediator provides an opinion regarding the merits of a case, it may not accurately reflect the likely outcome, but rather where the mediator believes the case may settle.


Regardless of the overall approach or style of the mediator, most mediations begin with some form of a joint session with all of the parties. At this session, each party will typically describe his case. In some circumstances the act of being able to present one’s case or story to the other side goes a long toward getting the parties engaged in the settlement process. Just having the other party hear your views and your frustrations can have a beneficial effect.



Ultimately, a case will settle if each party believes, based on its assessment of its position and the costs of risk of trial, that settlement is the best option. 


DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein is intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent legal counsel for advice on any legal matter. 


Copyright © 2025 The Overton Firm, LLC - All Rights Reserved.


Powered by